Narratives of risk: women at midlife, medical 'experts' and health technologies

Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10149/58444
Title:
Narratives of risk: women at midlife, medical 'experts' and health technologies
Authors:
Green, E. E. (Eileen); Thompson, D. (Diane); Griffiths, F. (Frances)
Affiliation:
University of Teesside.; Social Futures Institute. Unit for Social and Policy Research.
Citation:
Green, E. E., Thompson, D. and Griffiths, F. (2002) 'Narratives of risk: women at midlife, medical 'experts' and health technologies', Health Risk & Society, 4 (3), pp.273-286.
Publisher:
Taylor & Francis
Journal:
Health Risk & Society
Issue Date:
Nov-2002
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10149/58444
DOI:
10.1080/1369857021000016632
Abstract:
The 'management' of midlife women's bodies is becoming an increasingly important focus for both themselves and medical 'experts'. Health technologies play a major part in this process, given health promotion messages about their usefulness for maintaining and enhancing the quality of life. But how do individual women interpret such messages? This paper explores the factors that impact upon health decision making in relation to a group of these technologies. In particular, we examine how related risks are assessed by women themselves and jointly with health professionals, in the clinical context. Drawing upon literature from the sociology of the body and embodiment, debates about risk and feminist research on the menopause, we argue that midlife needs to be understood as an embodied experience and that women's decisions about technology-based health interventions need to be contextualised. The paper draws upon research data from interviews with individual women and health professionals, and recordings of clinical consultations which relate to the specific technologies of HRT, bone densitometry and breast screening. The data reveal the emergence of two major risk narratives within consultations and interviews, health risks and social risks. We conclude that the health decisions and practices of both lay women and health professionals reflect a complex mixture of expert knowledge and advice, and embodied cultural experience.
Type:
Article
Keywords:
risk; women; midlife; health; menopause; health interventions
ISSN:
1469-8331
Rights:
Subject to restrictions, author can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing). For full details see http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/ [Accessed 13/01/2010]
Citation Count:
14 [Scopus, 13/01/2010]

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorGreen, E. E. (Eileen)-
dc.contributor.authorThompson, D. (Diane)-
dc.contributor.authorGriffiths, F. (Frances)-
dc.date.accessioned2009-04-01T10:52:13Z-
dc.date.available2009-04-01T10:52:13Z-
dc.date.issued2002-11-
dc.identifier.citationHealth Risk & Society; 4 (3): 273-286-
dc.identifier.issn1469-8331-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/1369857021000016632-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10149/58444-
dc.description.abstractThe 'management' of midlife women's bodies is becoming an increasingly important focus for both themselves and medical 'experts'. Health technologies play a major part in this process, given health promotion messages about their usefulness for maintaining and enhancing the quality of life. But how do individual women interpret such messages? This paper explores the factors that impact upon health decision making in relation to a group of these technologies. In particular, we examine how related risks are assessed by women themselves and jointly with health professionals, in the clinical context. Drawing upon literature from the sociology of the body and embodiment, debates about risk and feminist research on the menopause, we argue that midlife needs to be understood as an embodied experience and that women's decisions about technology-based health interventions need to be contextualised. The paper draws upon research data from interviews with individual women and health professionals, and recordings of clinical consultations which relate to the specific technologies of HRT, bone densitometry and breast screening. The data reveal the emergence of two major risk narratives within consultations and interviews, health risks and social risks. We conclude that the health decisions and practices of both lay women and health professionals reflect a complex mixture of expert knowledge and advice, and embodied cultural experience.-
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis-
dc.rightsSubject to restrictions, author can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing). For full details see http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/ [Accessed 13/01/2010]-
dc.subjectrisk-
dc.subjectwomen-
dc.subjectmidlife-
dc.subjecthealth-
dc.subjectmenopause-
dc.subjecthealth interventions-
dc.titleNarratives of risk: women at midlife, medical 'experts' and health technologies-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Teesside.-
dc.contributor.departmentSocial Futures Institute. Unit for Social and Policy Research.-
dc.identifier.journalHealth Risk & Society-
ref.assessmentRAE 2008-
ref.citationcount14 [Scopus, 13/01/2010]-
or.citation.harvardGreen, E. E., Thompson, D. and Griffiths, F. (2002) 'Narratives of risk: women at midlife, medical 'experts' and health technologies', Health Risk & Society, 4 (3), pp.273-286.-
All Items in TeesRep are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.