Helsen, Gilis, and Weston (2006) do not err in questioning the optical error hypothesis as the only major account for explaining offside decision-making errors

Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10149/111434
Title:
Helsen, Gilis, and Weston (2006) do not err in questioning the optical error hypothesis as the only major account for explaining offside decision-making errors
Authors:
Helsen, W. F. (Werner); Gilis, B. (Bart); Weston, M. (Matthew)
Affiliation:
PGMOL. The FA Premier League.
Citation:
Helsen, W. F., Gilis, B. and Weston, M. (2007) 'Helsen, Gilis, and Weston (2006) do not err in questioning the optical error hypothesis as the only major account for explaining offside decision-making errors', Journal of Sports Sciences, 25(9), pp.991-994.
Publisher:
Taylor & Francis
Journal:
Journal of Sports Sciences
Issue Date:
Jul-2007
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10149/111434
DOI:
10.1080/02640410601150488
Additional Links:
http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&doi=10.1080/02640410601150488&magic=crossref||D404A21C5BB053405B1A640AFFD44AE3
Type:
Article
Language:
en
Keywords:
assistant referees; decision-making skills; offside
ISSN:
0264-0414
Rights:
Subject to an 18 month embargo, author can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing). For full details see http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/ [Accessed 20/09/2010]
Citation Count:
3 [Scopus, 20/09/2010]

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorHelsen, W. F. (Werner)en
dc.contributor.authorGilis, B. (Bart)en
dc.contributor.authorWeston, M. (Matthew)en
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-20T12:44:45Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-20T12:44:45Z-
dc.date.issued2007-07-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Sports Sciences; 25(9):991-994en
dc.identifier.issn0264-0414-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02640410601150488-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10149/111434-
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&doi=10.1080/02640410601150488&magic=crossref||D404A21C5BB053405B1A640AFFD44AE3en
dc.rightsSubject to an 18 month embargo, author can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing). For full details see http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/ [Accessed 20/09/2010]en
dc.subjectassistant refereesen
dc.subjectdecision-making skillsen
dc.subjectoffsideen
dc.titleHelsen, Gilis, and Weston (2006) do not err in questioning the optical error hypothesis as the only major account for explaining offside decision-making errorsen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentPGMOL. The FA Premier League.en
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Sports Sciencesen
ref.citationcount3 [Scopus, 20/09/2010]en
or.citation.harvardHelsen, W. F., Gilis, B. and Weston, M. (2007) 'Helsen, Gilis, and Weston (2006) do not err in questioning the optical error hypothesis as the only major account for explaining offside decision-making errors', Journal of Sports Sciences, 25(9), pp.991-994.-
All Items in TeesRep are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.