A systematic review comparing the appropriateness of the intravenous urogram and the Computed Tomography Urogram in terms of diagnostic accuracy and risk of radiation dose for patients with urolithiasis

Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10149/142449
Title:
A systematic review comparing the appropriateness of the intravenous urogram and the Computed Tomography Urogram in terms of diagnostic accuracy and risk of radiation dose for patients with urolithiasis
Authors:
Crompton, G. (Gemma); Cosson, P. (Philip)
Affiliation:
University of Teesside. School of Health and Social Care.
Citation:
Crompton, G. and Cosson, P. (2011) 'A systematic review comparing the appropriateness of the intravenous urogram and the Computed Tomography Urogram in terms of diagnostic accuracy and risk of radiation dose for patients with urolithiasis', Radiography, 17 (4), pp.304-310.
Publisher:
WB Saunders
Journal:
Radiography
Issue Date:
Nov-2011
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10149/142449
DOI:
10.1016/j.radi.2011.07.001
Additional Links:
http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1078817411000678
Type:
Article
Language:
en
Keywords:
CT; diagnosis; IVU; kidney stones; renal calculi
ISSN:
1078-8174
Rights:
Author cannot archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing). For full details see http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/ [Accessed 16/09/2011]
Citation Count:
0 [Scopus, 16/09/2011]

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorCrompton, G. (Gemma)en
dc.contributor.authorCosson, P. (Philip)en
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-16T09:26:55Z-
dc.date.available2011-09-16T09:26:55Z-
dc.date.issued2011-11-
dc.identifier.citationRadiography; 17 (4): 304-310en
dc.identifier.issn1078-8174-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.radi.2011.07.001-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10149/142449-
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherWB Saundersen
dc.relation.urlhttp://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1078817411000678en
dc.rightsAuthor cannot archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing). For full details see http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/ [Accessed 16/09/2011]en
dc.subjectCTen
dc.subjectdiagnosisen
dc.subjectIVUen
dc.subjectkidney stonesen
dc.subjectrenal calculien
dc.titleA systematic review comparing the appropriateness of the intravenous urogram and the Computed Tomography Urogram in terms of diagnostic accuracy and risk of radiation dose for patients with urolithiasisen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Teesside. School of Health and Social Care.en
dc.identifier.journalRadiographyen
ref.citationcount0 [Scopus, 16/09/2011]en
or.citation.harvardCrompton, G. and Cosson, P. (2011) 'A systematic review comparing the appropriateness of the intravenous urogram and the Computed Tomography Urogram in terms of diagnostic accuracy and risk of radiation dose for patients with urolithiasis', Radiography, 17 (4), pp.304-310.en
All Items in TeesRep are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.