Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10149/95379
Title:
ORO. The Physical Developer replacement?
Authors:
Wood, M. A. (Michael); James, T. (Tim)
Affiliation:
University of Teesside. School of Science and Technology.
Citation:
Wood, M. A. and James, T. (2009) 'ORO. The Physical Developer replacement?', Science & Justice, 49 (4), pp.272-276.
Publisher:
Elsevier
Journal:
Science & Justice
Issue Date:
Dec-2009
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10149/95379
DOI:
10.1016/j.scijus.2009.02.006
Abstract:
In the process of fingerprint development Physical Developer has been largely the method of choice on porous surfaces after coming into contact with wet environments. It is only recently that a new technique has been identified which could replace this standard technique. This study aims to build on previous research and expand knowledge regarding the technique. The study built on previous research and compared Physical Developer to Oil Red O, testing both on four paper types, while being placed in three different water types and an accelerant for various amounts of time. Marks were placed with both heavily 'loaded' sebaceous fingers and 'normal' un-washed fingers. Results show that Oil Red O consistently produced clearer more detailed marks from the 'loaded' fingers, but neither technique proved to work better on the 'normal' marks. Neither technique developed any prints from the accelerant.
Type:
Article
Language:
en
Keywords:
development; fingerprints; Oil Red O; physical developer
ISSN:
1355-0306
Rights:
Author can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing). For full details see http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/ [Accessed 31/03/2010]
Citation Count:
0 [Scopus, 31/03/2010]

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorWood, M. A. (Michael)en
dc.contributor.authorJames, T. (Tim)en
dc.date.accessioned2010-03-31T14:10:14Z-
dc.date.available2010-03-31T14:10:14Z-
dc.date.issued2009-12-
dc.identifier.citationScience & Justice; 49 (4): 272-276en
dc.identifier.issn1355-0306-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scijus.2009.02.006-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10149/95379-
dc.description.abstractIn the process of fingerprint development Physical Developer has been largely the method of choice on porous surfaces after coming into contact with wet environments. It is only recently that a new technique has been identified which could replace this standard technique. This study aims to build on previous research and expand knowledge regarding the technique. The study built on previous research and compared Physical Developer to Oil Red O, testing both on four paper types, while being placed in three different water types and an accelerant for various amounts of time. Marks were placed with both heavily 'loaded' sebaceous fingers and 'normal' un-washed fingers. Results show that Oil Red O consistently produced clearer more detailed marks from the 'loaded' fingers, but neither technique proved to work better on the 'normal' marks. Neither technique developed any prints from the accelerant.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.rightsAuthor can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing). For full details see http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/ [Accessed 31/03/2010]en
dc.subjectdevelopmenten
dc.subjectfingerprintsen
dc.subjectOil Red Oen
dc.subjectphysical developeren
dc.titleORO. The Physical Developer replacement?en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Teesside. School of Science and Technology.en
dc.identifier.journalScience & Justiceen
ref.citationcount0 [Scopus, 31/03/2010]en
or.citation.harvardWood, M. A. and James, T. (2009) 'ORO. The Physical Developer replacement?', Science & Justice, 49 (4), pp.272-276.-
All Items in TeesRep are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.